Agenda & Minutes

When available, the full agenda packet may be viewed as a PDF file by clicking the "Attachments" button and selecting the file you want to view.

Agendas are posted until the meeting date takes place.  Minutes are posted once they have been approved.

Mayor & Council (View All)

City Council Study Session Meeting Agenda & Minutes

Minutes
Thursday, April 26, 2018

AGENDA
April 26, 2018

6:00 p.m.
City Hall, Medford Room
411 W. 8th Street, Medford, Oregon
  1. Proposed Code Amendment of Chapter 10, Article II
  2. Proposed Code Amendment – Senate Bill 1051 (updated housing laws)
  3. Warming/Cooling Shelters
  4. Transitional Housing
  
MINUTES
April 26, 2018

6:00 p.m.
City Hall, Medford Room
411 W. 8th Street, Medford, Oregon

The Medford City Council Study Session was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Medford Room of the Medford City Hall on the above date with the following members and staff present:
 
Mayor Gary Wheeler; Councilmembers Clay Bearnson (joined by phone at 7:30 p.m.); Kay Brooks (arrived at 6:15 p.m.), Tim D’Alessandro, Dick Gordon, Tim Jackle, Kim Wallan, Michael Zarosinski
 
City Manager Brian Sjothun; City Attorney Lori Cooper; City Recorder Karen Spoonts;
 
Councilmembers Kevin Stine was absent.
 
Proposed Code Amendment of Chapter 10, Article II – Carla Paladino
Principal Planner Carla Paladino presented two proposals to Chapter 10 and a minor comprehensive plan amendment. Planning Commission has recommended both.
  • Amend and reorganize Article II and update other Articles affected by state revisions
    • Format Changes
    • Comprehensive Plan Changes
 
Council comments:
  • Appeals would go to the Planning Commission
  • Standing would come if they submit in writing
  • Bring forward for final hearing on amendments
 
Proposed Code Amendment – Senate Bill 1051 (updated housing laws) – Seth Adams
Changes resulting from new Senate Bill, effective August 15, 2017
  • Expedite permitting for affordable housing
  • Remove barriers to residential development
  • Residential development review criteria
 
Council Comments:
  • New language doesn’t override historical restrictions; a separate bill would have addressed that
  • Review new requirements with SPAC members
  • Study sessions are not done with SPAC, but could be done with a regular meeting
 
Potential Hearing Schedule
  • May 14 – Planning Commission study session
  • May 24 – Planning Commission hearing
  • June 21 – City Council hearing
 
Warming/Cooling Shelters – Kyle Kearns
  • Noted revisions from past study sessions; weather based timing events; removal of the allowance of tents, yurts, and similar structures; concentration prevented with 500; distancing requirement; create standards for revocation of permits
  • Code language overview
  • Scenarios presented on future
  • Planning Commission study session
    • Unsure of need for 500’ distancing requirement
    • Mixed opinions on keeping or removing language
    • Concerns over unlimited number of shelters
    • Prohibit tents and yurts
    • Why site plan if all inside a building
       
Council comments:
  • 500’ feet requirement
  • Churches in residential neighborhood; impacts are different than the rest of the neighborhood
  • Neighbors should have an option to provide input
  • Can we include case management program that would be using the facility; is in the operations plan
  • Schools can be included
  • Day care programs are not included in the operations plan, but could be
  • One facility could be used for cooling and/or warming shelter
  • Using specific dates for shelter operation is difficult to enforce
  • Council liked that it could be year-round; difficult to get volunteers and could be easier if it was consistent
  • Temporary shelters could only be open 180 days or the facility would need to meet code
  • Handle each concern on a case-by-case basis
  • Establish set criteria on conditional use level and services
  • Sleeping outside costs about $150/night
  • Council wanted to repeat success of last year
  • Currently, ACCESS does want to the offer services
  • Need a CUP in residential
  • Clarify timing; warming and cooling are different
  • Permitted in commercial zones, but option of including locations adjacent to residential, or within a buffer zone
  • Topic goes to the Planning Commission next, then back to Council for another study session before the public hearing
 
Recess until 7:30 p.m.
Councilmember Clay Bearnson joined the meeting via phone.
 
Transitional Housing – Matt Brinkley
Requested feedback on:
  • Revise transitional housing standards
  • Land development code revised to allow four additional
  • Cease work on DCA 17-062
  • Hope Village takes two spaces; two more allowed
  • Code language overview
  • All conditional use permits with standards
  • Commercial and industrial zones
 
Council comments:
  • There are currently 14 houses at the Hope Village on multiple lots
  • Discussed ORS 446.265
    • Exception to landlord and tenant law and cannot counteract that with our code
    • City is legally full with Hope Village
    • Legal should review the issue regarding compliance with ORS 446.265
    • Need to determine whether City can exercise home rule authority
  • Approximately 250 homeless are not sheltered
  • Currently City is limited to the urban campground approach
  • Population size limited to 40
  • Should this be part of a global housing approach; possibly reach out to outlying cities
  • Possibly create a Legislative Committee to address urban campground and relax rules
  • Hope Village was supposed to be a temporary basis
 
Councilmember Bearnson left the meeting.
 
The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
 
 
 
 
Karen M. Spoonts, MMC
City Recorder
 
 

© 2019 City Of Medford  •  Site Handcrafted in Ashland, Oregon by Project A

Quicklinks

Select Language

Share This Page

Back to Top